User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; en-us; lg-gb175) AppleWebKit/530.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/8.5.0.185/82/352/UCWEB Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGgb175closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesBot/Crawler0.053 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesclose0.047 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 530.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mobile Safari close LGgb175mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 8.5WebKit LGgb175smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.5.0close LGgb175closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.08401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 8.5.0.185WebKit 530.13 LGLGgb175closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 8.5Gecko LGgb175mobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close UCWebUCBrowserFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 8.5.0.185close LGgb175closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:27 | by ThaDafinser