User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-CA; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020314 Netscape6/6.2.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeWindows ME closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 6.2Gecko WinME MEDesktop0.019 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Netscape closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Netscape Navigator 6.2.2closeWindows 4.90desktop-browsercloseclose0.20301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Netscape 6.2Gecko Windows MEdesktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Netscape Navigator 6.2.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Netscape 6.2.2closeWindows ME closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Netscape 6Gecko 0.9.4.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Netscape 6.2.2closeWindows Me closecloseclosecloseclose0.09101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 6.2.2Gecko 20020314Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape 6.2.2Gecko 0.9.4Windows MEdesktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Netscape 6closeWindows Mecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:25 | by ThaDafinser