User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Teleca Q7; Brew 4.0.3; U; en) 240X400 LGE LG840
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGLG840closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeBREWOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo Q 7closeBrew 4.0.3LGLG840mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo Brew 4.0LGLG840smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close LGLG840closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Teleca-Obigo Q7close closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 7 Brew 4.0.3LGLG840mobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close LGLG840Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Teleca Q7close LGLG840closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:21 | by ThaDafinser