User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 SonyEricssonC902v/
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SonyEricssonC902vclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close Sony EricssonC902vmobile-browseryescloseclose0.20401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Sony EricssonC902vfeature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 4.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SonyEricssonC902vcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 4.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 4.0 Sony EricssonSony Ericsson C902vcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Sony EricssonC902vmobile:featureyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SonyEricssonC902Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
close SonyEricssonC902vcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:20 | by ThaDafinser