User agent detail

Mozilla/4.51 [fr] (Win95; I)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Netscape 4.51Gecko unknownWin95 95unknownWindows DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 4.51Gecko Win95 95Desktop0.006 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Netscape Communicator 4.5.1closeWindows 4.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Windows 95desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 4.51close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 4.51 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15801 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 4.51 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape Communicator 4.5.1 Windows 95desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows 95closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:20 | by ThaDafinser