User agent detail

Yeti/1.1 (Naver Corp.; http://help.naver.com/robots/)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/bots.yml
closecloseyesYeti/NaverbotSearch bot0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesNaverBotBot/Crawler0.006 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesNaverBotclose0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Yeti 1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesNaver Yeticlose0.21201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesYeti/NaverbotSearch bot0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesYeticlose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesYetiCrawler0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesNaver Yeticlose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesNaver Yeticlose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:16 | by ThaDafinser