User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux armv7l; HbbTV/1.2.1 (; Philips; 28HFL5009D12; ; PHILIPSTV; CE-HTML/1.0 NETTV/4.4.1 SmartTvA/3.0.0 Firmware/004.001.163.001 (PhilipsTV, 3.1.1,)en) ) Presto/2.12.407 Version/12.50
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Opera 12.50Presto GNU/Linux Philips28HFL5009D12tvcloseclose0 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/philips.yaml
Opera Devices 3.4Presto 2.12.407 HFL5009televisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 12.50Presto 2.12Linux Smartphone OS Desktop0.006 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Opera 12.50closeLinux Smartphone OS closecloseDesktopclose0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera 12.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 12.50closeLinux media-playercloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 12.50Presto GNU/Linux Philips28HFL5009D12tv0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 12.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.2.1closeLinux Philips28HFL5009D12closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 12.50Presto 2.12.407closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 12.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 12.50Presto 2.12.407Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42902 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera Devices 3.4Presto 2.12.407 PhilipsHFL5009 Net TVtelevisioncloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera 12.50closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Maple Browser closeGNU/Linux Samsung Smart TVcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:16 | by ThaDafinser