User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a4pre) Gecko/20070404 SeaMonkey/1.5a
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
SeaMonkey 1.5acloseWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.9a4precloseWindows 5.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

SeaMonkey 1.5acloseWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SeaMonkey 1.5Gecko Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
SeaMonkey 1.5acloseWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 1.5closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.9closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

SeaMonkey 1.5acloseWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.18301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Seamonkey 1.5aGecko 20070404Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
SeaMonkey 1.5Gecko 1.9a4Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
SeaMonkey 1.5acloseWindows XPcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:09 | by ThaDafinser