User agent detail

5acd734a-1ed3-4a17-ad9d-0b09ae7bc2d2/Nutch-1.7
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/bots.yml
closecloseyesNutch-based Botcrawler0 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
closecloseyesApache Nutchclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesNutchBot/Crawler0.053 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesNutchclose0.09501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
5acd734a-1ed3-4a17-ad9d-0b09ae7bc2d2 Nutchcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesApache Nutchclose0.20901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesNutch-based Botcrawler0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesNutchclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesApache Nutchclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:08 | by ThaDafinser