User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; IBrowse 2.3; AmigaOS4.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-amigaos.yaml
IBrowse 2.3 AmigaOS 4.0desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesAmigaBot/Crawler0.02 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesAmigaclose0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IBrowse closeAmiga OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.20601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
IBrowse 2.3 AmigaOS 4.0desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 4.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

IBrowse 2.3closeAmigaOS 4.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.10901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 4.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.33602 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
IBrowse 2.3 AmigaOS 4.0desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
IBrowse 2.3closeAmigaOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:08 | by ThaDafinser