User agent detail

Opera/9.51 (X11; FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE i386; U; en)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeFreeBSD 6.1closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 9.51Presto 2.0FreeBSD Desktop0.01 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Opera 9.51closeFreeBSD closecloseDesktopclose0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 9.51closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera close closecloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 9.51closeBSD 6.1-RELEASEdesktop-browsercloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 9.51Presto FreeBSD 6.1desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 9.51closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.51closeFreeBSD 6.1closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 9.51 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15501 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 9.51closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.07501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 9.51 FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 9.51 FreeBSD 6.1desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.51closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeFreeBSD Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 9.51closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:08 | by ThaDafinser