User agent detail

Samsung-SPHM540BST Polaris/6.0 MMP/2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SamsungSPHM540BSTclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Polaris 6.0 Mobile Deviceyes0.014 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Polaris 6.0close closecloseMobile Deviceyesclose0.035 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Samsung-SPHM540BST closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Polaris 6.0closeJVM SamsungSPH-M540mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Polaris 6.0 SamsungSPHM540BSTsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Polaris 6.0close SamsungSPHM540BSTcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Polaris 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.14501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Polaris 6.0 SamsungSPHM540BST Polarismobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close SamsungSPH-M540Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Polaris 6.0close SamsungSPHM540BSTcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:05 | by ThaDafinser