User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; en-US) AppleWebKit/531.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) AdobeAIR/2.5.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Adobe AIR 2.5WebKit Win32 Desktop0.037 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Adobe AIR 2.5closeWin32 closecloseDesktopclose0.026 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 531.9closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Adobe AIR runtime 2.5.1closeWindows software-librarycloseclose0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Windows desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
AdobeAIR 2.5.1closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 531.9closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.076 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Adobe AIR 2.5.1WebKit 531.9Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
AdobeAIR 2.5.1Webkit 531.9Windows desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:04 | by ThaDafinser