User agent detail

HRCrawler/2.0 (XF86; MacOS x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.31 (KHTML, like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
yesHRCrawlerBot/Crawler0 Detail
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
HRCrawler 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesHRCrawlerBot/Crawler0.008 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesHRCrawlerclose0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 537.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.001 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesHRCrawlerclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.18101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Gecko based browser WebKit 537.31 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeMacintosh closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:08:01 | by ThaDafinser