User agent detail

Motorola-VE20 Obigo/Q05A1 MMP/2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close MotorolaVE20closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Obigo Q 5.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.016 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Obigo Q 5.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.041 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Motorola-VE20 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM MotorolaVE20mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo Q05A1 MotorolaVE20smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 5.1close MotorolaVE20closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 05 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Q05A1 Browser Q05A1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.33602 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 5A MotorolaVE20mobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Teleca Obigo Q05A1close MotorolaVE20Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo Q05A1close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:07:59 | by ThaDafinser