User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; i-mate JASJAM PPC; 240x320)/UC Browser7.8.0.95
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close i-mateJASJAMclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
UC Browser 7.8Gecko Windows Mobile JASJAMmobile:smartclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
IEMobile 4.01Trident 3.1WinCE Mobile Phoneyes0.017 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
IE 4.01closeWin32 closecloseDesktopclose0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MSIE 4.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 4.01closeWindowsMobileOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IE 4.01closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.21901 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
UC Browser 7.8 Windows CE i-mateJASJAMfeature phoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.8.0closeWindows CE i-mateJASJAMcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Internet Explorer 4.01 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.075 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

UC Browser 7.8.0.95 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
UC Browser 7.8Gecko Windows Mobile i-mateJASJAMmobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
UC Browser 7.8.0.95closeWindows CEcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:07:56 | by ThaDafinser