User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de-DE; rv:1.9.0.19) Gecko/2010091808 ThumbShotsBot (KFSW 3.0.6-3)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
ThumbShotsBot close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesThumbShotsBotBot/Crawler0.032 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesThumbShotsBotclose0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.9.0.19closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:1.9.0.19closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesThumbShotsBotclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.9.0.19closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 1.9.0.19Gecko 2010091808Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Gecko 1.9.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:07:55 | by ThaDafinser