User agent detail

OneBrowser/3.1 (SonyEricssonJ10i2/R7CA061)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
OneBrowser 3.1 Elmmobile:featureclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
OneBrowser 3.1WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.004 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
OneBrowser 3.1close closecloseMobile Phoneyesyesclose0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
OneBrowser 3.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

OneBrowser 3.1close Sony EricssonElmmobile-browseryescloseclose0.22001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
ONE Browser 3.1WebKit Sony EricssonElmfeature phoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
ONE Browser 3.1close SonyEricssonJ10i2closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.14901 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

OneBrowser 3.1 Sony EricssonSony Ericsson J10i2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
OneBrowser 3.1 Sony EricssonElmmobile:featureyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
OneBrowser 3.1close SonyEricssonJ10i2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:07:52 | by ThaDafinser