User agent detail

Mozilla/3.0 (Windows 2000; U) Opera 5.12 [de]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-windows.yaml
Opera 5.12 Windows 2000desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 3.0Gecko Win32 Desktop0.005 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Netscape 3.0closeWin32 closecloseDesktopclose0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 5.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera 5.12closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 5.12closeWindows 2000desktop-browsercloseclose0.21201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 5.12Presto Windows 2000desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 5.12close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 5.12closeWindows 2000 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 5.12 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 5.12close closecloseclosecloseclose0.057 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 5.12 Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23201 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 5.12 Windows 2000desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 5.12closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 5.12closeWindows 2000closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:07:46 | by ThaDafinser