User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/4.5; NetBSD 5.0.2; X11; amd64; en_US) KHTML/4.5.4 (like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-bsd.yaml
Konqueror 4.5KHTML 4.5.4NetBSD 5.0.2desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Konqueror 4.5KHTML 4.5 Desktop0.071 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Konqueror 4.5close closecloseDesktopclose0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Konqueror 4.5closeBSD 5.0.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.20001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Konqueror 4.5KHTML NetBSD 5.0desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Konqueror 4.5;closeNetBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.5closeNetBSD 5.0.2closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0KHTML 4.5.4closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15201 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Konqueror 4.5closeNetBSD 5.0.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.084 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Konqueror 4.5 a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23901 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Konqueror 4.5KHTML 4.5.4NetBSD 5.0.2desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Konqueror 4.5closeNetBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:07:45 | by ThaDafinser