User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64) KHTML/4.12.4 (like Gecko) Konqueror/4.12
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-konqueror.yaml
Konqueror 4.12KHTML 4.12.4FreeBSD desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Konqueror 4.12closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.19701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Konqueror 4.12KHTML FreeBSD desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Konqueror 4.12closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.12closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0KHTML 4.12.4closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Konqueror 4.12closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Konqueror 4.12 FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Konqueror 4.12KHTML 4.12.4FreeBSD desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Konqueror 4.12closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:07:42 | by ThaDafinser