User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Cygwin) AppleWebKit/534.34 (KHTML, like Gecko) konqueror/4.13.3 Safari/534.34
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-konqueror.yaml
Konqueror 4.13.3Webkit 534.34 desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 534.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 534.34close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Konqueror 4.13.3close desktop-browsercloseclose0.21201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Konqueror 4.13WebKit 0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.13.3close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Safari 534.34WebKit 534.34closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.077 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Konqueror 4.13.3WebKit 534.34Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Konqueror 4.13.3Webkit 534.34 desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Konqueror 4.13.3close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:07:33 | by ThaDafinser