User agent detail

AmigaVoyager/3.4.4 (MorphOS/PPC native) user-agent
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
Amiga Voyager 3.4.4closeMorphOS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesAmigaBot/Crawler0.018 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesAmigaclose0.043 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AmigaVoyager 3.4.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeMacintosh closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Amiga Voyager 3.4.4closeMorphOS desktop-browsercloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Amiga Voyager 3.4 AmigaOS desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

AmigaVoyager 3.4.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Voyager 3.4.4 MorphOS desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Amiga Voyager 3.4.4closeMorphOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:07:30 | by ThaDafinser