User agent detail

Opera/8.01 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS; en)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Opera 8.01Presto 1.0MacPPC unknownAppleMacintoshDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Opera 8.01Presto 1.0MacPPC AppleMacintoshDesktop0.007 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Opera 8.01closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Opera closeMacintosh closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Opera 8.01closeMac OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.21101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Opera 8.01Presto Mac desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Opera 8.01close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.1close closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Opera 8.01 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Opera 8.01close closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Opera 8.1 Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Opera 8.01 Mac OS desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 8.01closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Opera 8.01closePPC Mac OS Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Opera 8.01closeMacintosh closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:07:30 | by ThaDafinser