User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 7.11) PPC; 240x320; HTC_Touch_Viva_T2223; OpVer 86.157.15.753
Additional headers
UA-OS Windows CE (Pocket PC) - Version 5.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Mobile 6.1Touch Vivamobile:smartclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
IEMobile 7.11Trident 3.1WinCE Mobile Phoneyes0.014 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
IE 6.0closeWin32 closecloseDesktopcloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
BrowscapPhp
6014
IE 6.0closeWin32 closecloseDesktopclose0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
IEMobile 7.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 7.11closeWindowsMobileOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IE Mobile 7.11closeWindows HTCHTC Touch Viva T2223mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
IE Mobile 7.11Trident Windows CE HTCTouch Viva T2223smartphoneyes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 7.11closeWindows CE HTCTouch Viva T2223closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Internet Explorer 6.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.13401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

IE Mobile 7.11closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.07501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer Mobile Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.64006 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Mobile 6.1HTCTouch Vivamobile:smartyescloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile HTCTouch Viva T2223Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.05001 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
IEMobile 7.11closeWindows CEHTCTouchcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-17 06:37:42 | by ThaDafinser