User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0) Gecko/20110318 WebianShell/0.
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
Webian Shell 0.closeGNU/Linux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Webian Shell closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21401 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 2.0closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 2.0Gecko 20110318Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Gecko 2.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Webian Shell closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:07:25 | by ThaDafinser