User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win95; en-GB; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeWindows 95 closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 7.0Gecko Win95 95Desktop0.031 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Netscape 7.0closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Netscape Navigator 7.0closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.19801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Netscape 7.0Gecko Windows 95desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Netscape Navigator 7.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Netscape 7.0closeWindows 95 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Netscape 7.0Gecko 1.0.1closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Netscape 7.0closeWindows 95 closecloseclosecloseclose0.075 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 7.0Gecko 20020823Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape 7.0Gecko 1.0.1Windows 95desktopcloseclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Netscape 7.0closeWindows 95closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:07:21 | by ThaDafinser