User agent detail

PhilipsX600/1.0 NXP5210/DV9 Release/9.01.2008 Browser/Obigo2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close PhilipsX600closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Teleca-Obigo JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.019 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Teleca-Obigo closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.042 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
PhilipsX600 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.005 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM PhilipsX600mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo PhilipsX600smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 2.0close PhilipsX600closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 2.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.16101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Browser closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo 2.0 PhilipsX600mobile:featureyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close PhilipsX600Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo 2.0close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:07:18 | by ThaDafinser