User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win16; en-US; rv:1.7) Safari/85.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeWindows 3.1 closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 85.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 85.5closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:1.7closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.20201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Safari WebKit Windows desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeWindows 3.1 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Safari 85.5Gecko 1.7closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeWindows 16 closecloseclosecloseclose0.09201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Safari Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Safari Windows desktopcloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari closeWindows 3.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:07:17 | by ThaDafinser