User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-821.php
Safari 0.0WebKit unknownLinux unknownunknownLinux DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Safari WebKit Linux Desktop0.018 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Safari 537.36closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Safari 537.36closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Safari 537.36closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Safari WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Safari 537.36WebKit 537.36closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15701 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.067 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Webkit 537.36Linux desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Safari closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:07:16 | by ThaDafinser