User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.3; en-US; Liquid-Metal-S120 Build/8O5308)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close AcerLiquid-Metal-S120closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeAndroidOS 2.3.3closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Android Browser closeAndroid 2.3.3Liquid-Metal-S120mobile-browseryescloseclose0.30502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Navigator closeAndroid 2.3.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.3closeAndroid 2.3.3AcerLiquid-Metal-S120closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Stock Android Browser Android 2.3.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Android Browser Android 2.3.3Liquid-Metal-S120mobile:smartyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Android 2.3.3closeAndroid 2.3.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeAndroid 2.3.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:07:12 | by ThaDafinser