User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; nl-NL; rv:1.6) Gecko/20050714 Linspire/1.6-5.1.0.50.linspire2.70
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Zsxsoft
1.3
vendor/zsxsoft/php-useragent/tests/UserAgentList.php
Mozilla Compatible closeLinspire closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.6closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Mozilla rv:1.6closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21601 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 1.6closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0Gecko 1.6closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15501 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla 1.6closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.062 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 1.6Gecko 20050714Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Gecko 1.6Linux desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeLinspire closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:07:11 | by ThaDafinser