User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux armv7l) AppleWebKit/535.22+ (KHTML, like Gecko) WebKitGTK+/1.8.1 luakit
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
luakit 1.8WebKit unknownLinux unknownunknownLinux DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
luakit 1.8WebKit Linux Desktop0.025 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
luakit 1.8closeLinux closecloseDesktopclose0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
AppleWebKit 535.22closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
LuaKit WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
LuaKit closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 535.22closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15401 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0WebKit 535.22Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
LuaKit Webkit 535.22Linux closeclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
closeLinux Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:07:07 | by ThaDafinser