User agent detail

iCab J/2.8.2 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-icab.yaml
iCab 2.8.2 Mac OS desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
iCab closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeMacintosh closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

iCab JcloseMac OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.20701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
iCab iCab Mac desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
iCab Jclose closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

iCab 2.8.2 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

iCab close closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

iCab Mac closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24301 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
iCab 2.8.2 Mac OS desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
iCab JcloseMacintosh closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:07:00 | by ThaDafinser