User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030729 Mozilla Firebird/0.6.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-900.php
Firefox 0.6Gecko 1.0SunOS unknownunknowngeneral DesktopDesktop0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Firefox 0.6Gecko 1.0SunOS Desktop0.035 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Firefox 0.6closeSunOS closecloseDesktopclose0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla 1.5aclose closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Firebird (old name for Firefox) 0.6.1closeSolaris desktop-browsercloseclose0.21701 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Firebird 0.6Gecko Solaris desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Firebird 0.6.1closeSunOS closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeSolaris closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Firebird 0.6.1Gecko 1.5closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15301 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Firebird 0.6.1closeSunOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.14401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Firebird 0.6.1Gecko 20030729SunOS SunUltraSparccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Firebird 0.6.1Gecko 1.5Solaris desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Firebird 0.6.1closeSolaris closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:59 | by ThaDafinser