User agent detail

LG Browser/5.0.0 InettvBrowser/2.2 (00E091;LGE2D2012M;01;00)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/television/lg.yaml
LG Browser 5.0 televisionclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

LG Browser 5.0.0close media-playercloseclose0.22201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
LG Browser 5.0 LGBrowsersmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LGE2D2012Mcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet TV Browser 2.2 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
LG Browser 5.0 LGNetCast TV 2012televisioncloseclose0.001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
InternetTVBrowser closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
close LGcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:58 | by ThaDafinser