User agent detail

Mozilla/4.01 [en] (Win16; I)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/os-windows.yaml
Netscape Communicator 4.0.1 Windows desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Netscape 4.0Gecko Win16 Desktop0.01 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Netscape Communicator 4.0.1closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.23001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 4.01close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeWindows 3.1 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Mozilla 4.01 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Netscape Navigator 4.1 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Netscape Communicator 4.0.1 Windows desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeWindows 3.11closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:55 | by ThaDafinser