User agent detail

MQQBrowser/Mini2.4 (SonyEricssonW595a/R3DA026)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close SonyEricssonW595aclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
QQbrowser Mini 2.4WebKit JAVA Mobile Phoneyesyes0.006 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
QQbrowser Mini 2.4closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesyesclose0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MQQBrowser Mini2.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

QQbrowser Mini2.4close Sony EricssonW595amobile-browseryescloseclose0.29202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
QQ Browser 2.4 Sony EricssonW595afeature phoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mini 2.4close SonyEricssonW595acloseclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.13761 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

QQ Browser Sony EricssonSony Ericsson W595acloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
QQ Browser Mini 2.4 Sony EricssonW595amobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
MQQBrowser Mini2.4close SonyEricssonW595acloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:54 | by ThaDafinser