User agent detail

Wget/1.14 (linux-gnu)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-849.php
yeswgetOffline Browser0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yeswgetOffline Browser0.005 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyeswgetclose0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Wget 1.14closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesWgetclose0.20801 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Wget 1.14 GNU/Linux desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

Wget 1.14closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Wget 1.14 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23601 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesWgetclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
HTTP Library wgetclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
wget 1.14closeGNU/Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:53 | by ThaDafinser