User agent detail

Bloodhound/2.1 CFNetwork/673.4 Darwin/13.3.0 (x86_64) (MacBookPro10%2C1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
closeMac OS X 10.9.3closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
CFNetwork WebKit MacOSX 10.9AppleMacintoshDesktop0.018 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
CFNetwork closeMacOSX closecloseDesktopclose0.043 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Bloodhound 2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

closeOS X 10.9.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.21301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Mac 10.9desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 673.4closeMac OS X 10.9.3AppleMacBookPro10,1closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25302 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
OS X Mavericks 10.9.3desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
CFNetwork App 7.0closeMac OS X 10.9Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeMac OS Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:52 | by ThaDafinser