User agent detail

PANTECH G500
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close PantechG500closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Pantech JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.004 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Pantech closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
PANTECH closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close PantechG500mobile-browseryescloseclose0.22001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
PantechG500smartphoneyes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close PantechG500closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

No result found
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
PantechG500mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close PantechG500Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:50 | by ThaDafinser