User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; acedo crawler extension)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
acedo crawler close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
IE 7.0Trident Desktop0.016 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
IE 7.0close closecloseDesktopcloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
BrowscapPhp
6014
IE 7.0close closecloseDesktopclose0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
IE 7.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

IE 7.0close desktop-browsercloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Internet Explorer 7.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesacedo crawlerclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Internet Explorer 7.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.086 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Internet Explorer 7.0Trident closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23401 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Internet Explorer 7.0 closeclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Internet Explorer 7.0close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:49 | by ThaDafinser