User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SH05C;FOMA;like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
Browscap
6014
vendor/browscap/browscap/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
Sharp 0.0Gecko unknownSymbianOS unknownNTT DoCoMoSH-05CMobile Phoneyes0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Sharp Gecko SymbianOS NTT DoCoMoSH-05CMobile Phoneyes0.011 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
No result found
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

close SharpSH05Cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.22501 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
SharpSH05Csmartphoneyes0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close DoCoMoSH05Ccloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24101 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
SharpSH05Cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo SH05Ccloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:48 | by ThaDafinser