User agent detail

iCab J/2.9.8 (Macintosh; U; PPC; Mac OS X)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-icab.yaml
iCab 2.9.8 OS X desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
iCab closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

iCab JcloseOS X desktop-browsercloseclose0.21101 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
iCab iCab Mac desktop0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
iCab JcloseOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

iCab 2.9.8 closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15501 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

iCab closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.068 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

iCab Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23801 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
iCab 2.9.8 OS X desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
iCab JcloseMac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:46 | by ThaDafinser