User agent detail

LG-GD570AW Browser/Obigo-Q7.3 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 MediaPlayer/LGPlayer/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close LGGD570AWclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Obigo Q 7.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.013 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Obigo Q 7.0closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
LG-GD570AW closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
ObigoBrowser closeJavaOS closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Obigo closeJVM LGGD570mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21301 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Obigo LGGD570AWsmartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 7.3close LGGD570AWcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Obigo 7.3 closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Obigo Browser LGLGGD570AWcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23701 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Obigo Q 7.3 LGGD570AWmobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Java Applet close LGGD570Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Obigo close LGGD570AWcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:45 | by ThaDafinser