User agent detail

VMVID Android Application (16, vmvid v2.2.2) - unknown FWS610_EU Feixun - 00000000-4269-B01C-FFFF-FFFFD8BD744F
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
close unknownFWS610_EUclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
No result found
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
VMVID closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeAndroidOS Applicationcloseclosecloseyescloseclose0.004 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Android Browser closeAndroid mobile-browseryescloseclose0.30902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Android Browser WebKit Android yes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid FWS610_EUcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Stock Android Browser Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
VMVID Android 2.2.2PhicommFWS610mobile:smartyescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
Android close Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeAndroid closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:43 | by ThaDafinser