User agent detail

Airmail 1.0.6 rv:196 (Macintosh; Mac OS X 10.8.4; en_GB)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
UAParser
v0.5.0.2
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Airmail 1.0.6close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Airmail 1.0WebKit MacOSX 10.8AppleMacintoshDesktop0.009 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Airmail 1.0closeMacOSX closecloseDesktopclose0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
Airmail closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
closeOS X 10.8.4closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

closeOS X 10.8.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Airmail 1.0 Mac 10.8desktop0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeOS X 10.8.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Airmail 1.0.6closeMac OS X 10.8.4closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

Gecko 196closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15101 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mac OS X 10.8.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.23501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
OS X Mountain Lion 10.8desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
closeMac OS X 10.8.4 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:41 | by ThaDafinser