User agent detail

NCSA_Mosaic/2.6L10N+ (X11;SunOS 5.6 sun4u) libwww/2.12 modified
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
vendor/whichbrowser/parser/tests/data/desktop/browser-mosaic.yaml
NCSA Mosaic 2.6 Solaris 2.6desktopclosecloseclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yeslibwwwBot/Crawler0.025 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyeslibwwwclose0.044 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
NCSA closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

NCSA Mosaic 2.6L10NcloseSolaris desktop-browsercloseclose0.21201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
NCSA Mosaic 2.6 Solaris 5.6desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
closeSunOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NCSA Mosaic 2.6closeSolaris closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseDesktopclosecloseclose0.15701 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

NCSA_Mosaic 2.6L10NcloseSunOS 5.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Mosaic 2.6L10N SunOS SunUltraSparccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.24501 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
NCSA Mosaic 2.6 Solaris 2.6desktopcloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
No result found
Zsxsoft
1.3
Mosaic 2.6L10NcloseSolaris closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:38 | by ThaDafinser