User agent detail

r355[TF268435460205582333000000014065648021] UP.Browser/6.2.3.8 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/unknown.yml
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.8 closeclose0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.047 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2closeJAVA closecloseMobile Phoneyesclose0.08801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
r355 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom

Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.8close SamsungR355mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21001 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentApiCom

closeclosecloseMobileclosecloseclose0.15001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom

No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.8 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.25001 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
Openwave 6.2 mobile:featureyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close SamsungR355Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.8close closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:38 | by ThaDafinser