User agent detail

W3C-checklink/4.0 [4.4] libwww-perl/5.803
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Test suite
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
vendor/piwik/device-detector/Tests/fixtures/bots.yml
closecloseyesW3C Link CheckerValidator0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapFull
6014
yesW3C-checklinkBot/Crawler0.02 Detail
BrowscapLite
6014
No result found
BrowscapPhp
6014
close closecloseyesW3C-checklinkclose0.045 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.1
W3C-checklink 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
JenssegersAgent
v2.3.3
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom

close closeyesW3C Link Checkerclose0.21201 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.6.1
yesW3C Link CheckerValidator0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.1
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
No result found
UserAgentApiCom

No result found
UserAgentStringCom

close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesW3C-checklinkLinkChecker0.10301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom

Library for WWW in Perl 5.803 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40202 Detail
WhichBrowser
v2.0.18
closeyesW3C Link Checkerclose0 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.7.1.0
close yescloseclose0.015 Detail
Zsxsoft
1.3
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-05-10 08:06:38 | by ThaDafinser